<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO Moves Blog - Search Engine Optimisation and Internet Marketing Tips and Resources &#187; Domains and URLs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seomoves.com.au/blog/category/domains-and-urls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seomoves.com.au/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:45:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Shifting Search Results Dividing Domain Listings</title>
		<link>http://www.seomoves.com.au/blog/2009/01/google-shifting-search-results-dividing-domain-listings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seomoves.com.au/blog/2009/01/google-shifting-search-results-dividing-domain-listings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domains and URLs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google search results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google serps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seomoves.org/blog/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just recently noticed Google starting to turn back the clock a little on multiple pages listed in search engine results. In the recent past if a domain had two URL&#8217;s showing in the top 10 or 20 results for a particular search query Google would typically merge these results(creating what Google calls sitelinks) pairing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just recently noticed Google starting to turn back the clock a little on multiple pages listed in search engine results. In the recent past if a domain had two URL&#8217;s showing in the top 10 or 20 results for a particular search query Google would typically merge these results(creating what Google calls sitelinks) pairing the weaker URL with the stronger URL. I have recently noticed that Google has begun to separate these domains within the results, offering the opportunity for websites to have 2 positions within the search engine results (for instance being number 2 and number 8).</p>
<p>I am not sure how this will change users behaviors yet, but in some instances it could benefit the website owner, offering a perceived very dominant position within the results moving the user to possibly after clicking on the initial result an bouncing revisiting the same website using the second listing, based upon the apparent authority Google places on a website or domain.</p>
<p>I think that having listings paired as Google has done in the past offered the opportunity for a user to look past the second listing (the merged one) and move on to the next result. I believe with these different results, it will offer a website a second opportunity to grab the user. I believe this is good for both users and webmasters.</p>
<p>I am not exactly sure why Google would tweak this, but apparently Google has their reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seomoves.com.au/blog/2009/01/google-shifting-search-results-dividing-domain-listings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Importance of the Domain Name and URLs</title>
		<link>http://www.seomoves.com.au/blog/2008/08/the-importance-of-the-domain-name-and-urls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seomoves.com.au/blog/2008/08/the-importance-of-the-domain-name-and-urls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domains and URLs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URLs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seomoves.org/blog/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although it is considered a very basic SEO step to be sure your URLs contain your keywords, it is still so often overlooked. Maybe because it is so basic, maybe because the concept is not new, maybe because it can be so daunting to rename pages on a site that was not built properly.  But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although it is considered a very basic SEO step to be sure your URLs contain your keywords, it is still so often overlooked. Maybe because it is so basic, maybe because the concept is not new, maybe because it can be so daunting to rename pages on a site that was not built properly.  But quite a few of our clients, even clients that have done SEO work, have overlooked this important step. We often hear &#8220;I know, I know, I have been meaning to do that.&#8221;  Do Not Overlook This Step. And you do not have to pay an SEO to know it, or to do it.</p>
<p>And this brings me to the importance of a domain name. Again this can be so very much overlooked, especially by small businesses.  Although some people claim a domain name does not matter in this day and age, the general consensus is that it truly is a factor in determining the success of a site.  To review the basics in choosing a domain:</p>
<p>1. Memorable. This typically means shorter. Though if you use an abbreviation to shorten it, you will lose some of that memorable factor if it is not a common abbreviation.  If your company is Clayton Watts AC Supply, though it is long, you want www.claytonwattsacsupply.com  over  an obscurely abbreviated www.cwacsupply.com</p>
<p>2. DOT COM.  You can survive without it, but is an uphill battle. If you have any option at all, choose a  .com over any other extension.</p>
<p>3. Keyword in the domain. This is SEO 101. If you sell keys, put it in the URL and company name.  This very often is in conflict with your branding, if your keyword is not in your company name. If your branding is not entrenched, if your existing domain is not older and established, you can consider rebranding for this reason.</p>
<p>4. Avoid oddball spellings. If your company is Easy Riding, do not consider ezriding.  Unless you change company name to EZ Riding, and use the letters prominently in all branding.  Even then you risk someone not finding you at easyriding.com who did not remember your shortcut.</p>
<p>5. Leave out punctuation: no symbols, no dashes, people will get very confused when trying to remember where the dashes are. If you are forced to use punctuation, be sure it is then included in your logo and all branding.  Leave the apostrophe out for &#8220;Mike&#8217;sUnderwear&#8221; and just use www.mikesunderwear.com</p>
<p>6. And versus &amp;.  If your company is Madonna &amp; Child, your main URL should match your branding with the ampersand. But you must try to get both domains, you just don&#8217;t know what people will remember.  People tend to type &#8220;and&#8221; more often.  Exception would be something like &#8216;M&amp;M&#8221; where the branding is so strong with the ampersand.</p>
<p>7. Describes your business.  If you have your keyword in your business name and/or URL, you are covered. But if not, consider what potential customers will see in search results.  If your site sells only silver jewelry, with the URL www.sweetnothings.com, this does not compel a customer to click your site over www.allthingssilver.com</p>
<p>All things considered, you can only do so much with your URL if your brand or company name is established. Best to consider the URL when naming your company. But even after the fact, you can make improvements and set yourself up for a slightly easier ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seomoves.com.au/blog/2008/08/the-importance-of-the-domain-name-and-urls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

